Impact of Trade reform in African Blocs
--Dr.Debesh Bhowmik
Using a multi-country and multi-sector CGE model, we can assess the economic effects of an African
CFTA.The analysis is based mainly on quantitative trade barriers
(tariffs). The modelling exercise envisages two scenarios for comparison
purposes. The first one considers the impact of two large FTAs in Africa: the
South-Eastern (S-E) FTA group comprising COMESA, SADC, EAC and IGAD,which
reflects the tripartite initiative; and the North-West-Central (N-W-C) FTA group covering ECOWAS,CEN-SAD, ECCAS and
UMA. The second scenario applies a continental approach, where all African countries fully
liberalize trade in goods. All scenarios are assumed
to be fully implemented by 2017. However, as variables need time
to adjust in the model, results are given for the year 2022. Comparisons are made between the scenarios considered
and the baseline (i.e. situation without the implementation of any trade reforms) and expressed in per cent or
absolute change, unless otherwise stated.
The prevailing conditions tend to indicate that high tariffs could
potentially contribute to low intra-African trade. Within the two FTA groups—S-E and N-W-C—average protection rates
are 7.7 per cent and 8.2 per cent. Intergroup average protection rates also
show wide variations in imposed and faced protection: S-E exports to the N-W-C
group face an average tariff of 16.5 per cent, and S-E group imposes 4.3 per
cent tariff on N-W-C imports (table ). The formation of two regional FTAs
(scenario 1) or the CFTA (scenario 2) would expand trade flows of African
countries. Thus, establishing two large trading blocs—SE and N-W-C—would
increase total African exports by US$ 17.6 billion (a 2.8 per cent increase
from the baseline where FTAs are not set up) and the CFTA would add as much as
US$ 25.3 billion (4.0 per cent) to the baseline, in 2022 .
PROTECTION AND TARIFF REVENUES BEFORE AND AFTER TRADE REFORM
|
|
Before trade reform 2004
|
After regional FTAs2022
|
After CFTA,2022
|
||||
Exporter
|
Importer
|
Trade million us$
|
Advalorem
Equivalent
Tariff%
|
Tariff revenue
Million US$
|
Advalorem
Equivalent
Tariff%
|
Tariff revenue
Million US$
|
Advalorem
Equivalent
Tariff%
|
Tariff revenue
Million US$
|
S-EFTA GROUP
|
S-EFTA GROUP
|
8541
|
7.7
|
653
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
0
|
N-W-CFTA GROUP
|
N-W-CFTA GROUP
|
5251
|
8.2
|
430
|
0
|
0
|
100
|
0
|
S-EFTA GROUP
|
N-W-CFTA GROUP
|
2521
|
16.5
|
417
|
16.5
|
417
|
100
|
0
|
N-W-CFTA GROUP
|
S-EFTA GROUP
|
1827
|
4.3
|
78
|
4.3
|
78
|
100
|
0
|
AFRICA-TOTAL
|
AFRICA-TOTAL
|
18140
|
8.7
|
1578
|
2.7
|
495
|
0
|
0
|
S-EFTA GROUP
|
ROW
|
90162
|
3.6
|
3283
|
3.6
|
3283
|
3.6
|
3283
|
N-W-CFTA-GROUP
|
ROW
|
121409
|
1.7
|
2092
|
1.7
|
2092
|
1.7
|
2092
|
ROW
|
S-EFTA-GROUP
|
92709
|
10
|
9237
|
10
|
9237
|
10
|
9237
|
ROW
|
N-W-CFTA GROUP
|
96119
|
17.1
|
16415
|
17.1
|
16415
|
17.1
|
16415
|
ROW
|
ROW
|
7878099
|
3.2
|
251391
|
3.4
|
282913
|
3.4
|
282418
|
WORLD-TOTAL
|
WORLD-TOTAL
|
8066926
|
3.4
|
283996
|
3.4
|
283996
|
3.4
|
283996
|
Source-African Development Bank,2013
indian govt..should follow this system..
ReplyDelete