ABSTRACT
I.Introduction
The promotion of the small-scale sector in India has been
an important thrust of industrial policy since independence though the focus of
concern changed with the priorities of each five year plan. A Small Scale
Industries Board was set up in 1954. Small Scale Industries and Agricultural
& Rural Industries and the Small Industries Development Organisation (SIDO)
which was under the Development Commissioner, Small Scale Industries were set
up in 1956. At the State level, the Commissioner/ Directorate of Industries
were the main institutional authority for SSIs. This structure has remained,
though several other institutions have come into being in the 1970s and 1980s,
particularly at the State level.
The Karve Committee Report (1955) was one of the earliest
of these exercises which recommended a protective environment for the growth of
small industries in India. Since then, policies targeted for the SSI sector
have aimed at fostering its growth through positive policy interventions in the
areas of finance, technology, infrastructure and extension services, among
several other requirements of the sector. Supportive policies through the
1960s, 70s and 80s took the form of reservation of products exclusively for the
SSI sector (836 products are reserved exclusively for SSIs at present) grant of
fiscal concessions and government procurement of supplies from the sector. Due
to liberalization, globalization and privatisation, SSI sector has so far been
insulated to a large extent from pressures of competition both domestically and
internationally. There are at least 3lakh units declared as sick and out of
production, accounting for 10 percent of the recorded units.
The sector now employs 17 million persons and is the second
largest employer of India's workforce after agriculture. It now accounts for
95% of all industrial units in the country and 40% of total output. About 7,500
products are manufactured in the small-scale sector. The export share is
35%.The composition of exports shows the largest shares of SSIs are in the
industry groups : hosiery and garments (29.0%) , food products (21.4%) and,
leather products (18%). The industry groups which have recorded high growth
rates and a large share in total production of SSIs are: textile products,
wood, furniture, etc., paper and printing, and metal products.
The total number of SSI working units in the country is estimated to be around 3 million. In terms of ownership, the vast majority of SSI units are proprietary concerns (80.5%) with only 16.8% functioning as partnerships and private limited. A UNIDO study defines clusters as 100 registered small-scale units. There are estimated 350 SME clusters in India which contribute directly and indirectly to 60% of India's exports. The location-wise distribution of clusters shows 65% concentrated in cities and metros and only 13% in small towns and rural areas. There is scope for encouraging the development of clusters in rural areas and rural-based artisan centres. The micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) currently employ 12 crore individuals and contribute 15 percent to GDP.
The total number of SSI working units in the country is estimated to be around 3 million. In terms of ownership, the vast majority of SSI units are proprietary concerns (80.5%) with only 16.8% functioning as partnerships and private limited. A UNIDO study defines clusters as 100 registered small-scale units. There are estimated 350 SME clusters in India which contribute directly and indirectly to 60% of India's exports. The location-wise distribution of clusters shows 65% concentrated in cities and metros and only 13% in small towns and rural areas. There is scope for encouraging the development of clusters in rural areas and rural-based artisan centres. The micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) currently employ 12 crore individuals and contribute 15 percent to GDP.
II. Objective
In this paper, the author tried to find out the growth of
output, employment, average productivity and export of small scale industries
in India during 1980-81-2014-15 and relate among them with GDP in India by
causality, cointegration and VEC models.
How much Indian GDP is affected by those factors was also
calculated by the author during the specified period. The new policy of the
Government of India on MSME is an added area of this paper.
III. Methodology
and data
Semi-log linear and exponential model were used to
calculate growths of output, employment, average productivity, and export of
SSI sector during 1980-81-2014-15. Double log multi-variable models were used
to show relationship between GDP, output, employment, average productivity and
export of SSI sector of India in the same period. Granger Causality, Johansen
cointegration and Vector Error Correction Models were used to relate among them.
The data of production, employment, average productivity of labour, exports of
SSI sector in India and GDP at factor cost of India during 1980-81-2014-15 were
collected from the Reserve Bank of India.
IV. Literature
review
Rao and Kiran(2014) studied that the sector has characterized
by low investment, operational flexibility, location wise mobility and import
substitution. The Sector has been undergone a metamorphic change in the era of
globalization. Many changes have taken place both national and international
markets. The sector is playing a prominent role in ensuring the inclusive
growth and regional balance. The sector is consistently registered a higher
growth rate than the rest of industrial sector. There are over 6000 products
ranging from traditional to high-tech items manufactured by this sector.
Besides, the sector is facing challenge in the form of competition and opened
opportunities due to improved technology, collaborations government
intervention. Malapati(2011) showed that small-scale industries have been playing
a momentous role in overall economic development of a country like India where
millions of people are unemployed or underemployed. This sector solves these
two problems through providing immediate large-scale employment, with lower
investments. According to Dr. Manmohan Singh, “the key to our success in
employment lies in the success of manufacturing in the small scale sector.” In
a country like India, where capital is scarce and unemployment is wide spread,
growth of small-scale industries is vital in order to achieve balanced economic
growth. The strength of small-scale enterprises lies in their wide spread
dispersal in rural, semi-urban and urban areas, fostering entrepreneurial base,
shorter gestation period, and equitable distribution of income and wealth. Susmita
Mohan(2014) described that in Kerala the amount of investment and the value of
production has increased but, with respect to the amount of employment and the
number of enterprises, a marginal decline has been observed. The total number
of small enterprises does not show a real progress. If the potential of SSI is
properly harnessed, it can help in accelerating the pace of socio-economic
development and balanced regional growth apart from creation of employment
opportunities. It is very essential to develop the industrial sector of Kerala
mainly through the development of SSI sector. Hussain(2004) showed that the
growth, production, export potentiality of SSI sector of India are high.
Bayiuei(2004) explained that paper highlights the role and performance of
small-scale industries in the economy with the parameters of number of units,
production, employment and exports. The Report of Loksava Secretariat (2014)
showed the export, credit and sick industries and government policies of SSI
sector of India. Garg(1996) analysed the growth of SSI sector especially after
1980 and examined structure of fiscal incentives which improved the growth of
SSI sector. Vanipriya and Venkatrumaraju (2011) studied that Small scale
industry is widely recognized as a powerful instrument for socio economic
growth and balanced sectoral development. One of the distinctive
characteristics of small scale sector is that the development of these
industries would create broader employment opportunities assisting
entrepreneurship and skills development and ensure better use of scarce
financial resources and appropriate technology. The small enterprises have by
now established their competence to manufacture a wide variety of sophisticated
goods in different product lines requiring a high degree of skill and
precision. Chowdhury and Saini (2015) indicate that small manufacturers are
affected in the globalization era and facing lot of problems to run their
businesses. It has been observed that units from all surveyed industries irrespective
of age and turnover believed that liberalization has resulted into more
competition, increased quality consciousness, difficulty in marketing, dumping
of cheaper goods by other countries, reduction in profit margin and high level
of customer satisfaction. Small units are not using latest machinery to
manufacturer quality product with latest design as per international standards.
There is absence of clear policies relating to marketing
and human resource management. Most of the units do not have separate marketing
and human resource departments. Small manufacturers are unable to attract the
professionals because of their financial limitations. Another problem of the
small units is that there is lack of cluster association for the small
industry. The operational cluster associations are ineffective and not helping
much to the industry. The domestic and foreign markets have become highly
competitive due to the process of liberalization. Sonia and Kansal(2009)showed the growth of output, employment and export
of SSI sector of the Indian economy after reform. Jena(2009) emphasized in the Vishesh
Krishi and Gramin Udyog Yojana (VKGUY) including other incentives and
concessions, the export obligation period for cottage and tiny industrial
sector in SEZ Schemes the export
oriented Small Scale Industries and the clusters approach for development of
small and medium scale industries and potentiality of export. Shivani
Mishra(2012) threw light on the role of MSME to uplift the social disadvantage
group and highlighted the MSME status in the era of globalization and also
mentioned review for the same. Lastly she suggested that apart from
governmental role it is also responsibility of MSME sector to be empowered
about awareness, access and usage of government policy and programme. This
proactive approach helps MSME sector to sustain in liberalization era.
V. Econometric
observations on small scale industries in India.
Production of SSI in India during 1980-81-2014-15 has been
increasing at the rate of 10.12% per year significantly.
Log(x1)=6.066699+0.10126t
(35.307)*
(12.16)*
R2=0.817 ,F=147.94* ,DW=0.2298 ,where x1=output
of SSI sector , *=significant at 5% level.
Even
the SSI production has been increasing exponentially at the rate of 0.554% per
annum during 1980-81-2014-15 which is significant at 5% level.
The estimated AR(2) process in the model of ARMA Maximum
Likelihood method of the SSI production
during 1980-81-2014-15 is highly good fit and stable but its AR(1) is
significant and AR(2) process in insignificant and thus the model is divergent.
X1t=8.107859+1.168611x1t-1-0.187227x1t-2+0.06178σ2t
(5.55)* (3.66)*
(-0.608) (7.27)*
R2=0.95 , F=203.61*
, DW=2.01 , Inverted AR root=0.98 and 0.19 respectively.
Similarly the ARIMA(1,1,1) model of SSI production is
estimated as stable, stationary and divergent because its AR(1) is significant
and convergent but its MA(1) is insignificant and divergent and its root is
imaginary .The estimated equation is a good fit and is given below.
X1t=8.119189+0.9800x1t-1+εt+0.1557εt-1+0.0621σ2t
(5.50)* (7.30)* (0.396) (7.26)*
R2=0.95,F=202.26* , root of AR=0.98 , root of
MA=-0.16
Average
productivity of SSI in India during 1980-81-2014-15 has been increasing at the
rate of 1.68% per year significantly
Log(x3)=4.3707+0.016822t
(33.40)* (2.65)*
R2=0.1758 ,F=7.04 ,DW=0.289,*=significant
VIII. Conclusions
The
paper concludes that output of SSI sector has been increasing at the rate of
10.12% per year and exponentially at the rate of 0.554% per year during
1980-81-2014-15.The series is stationary, stable and divergent as indicated by
ARIMA and AR models. Average productivity, employment and export of SSI sector
have been rising at the rates of 1.68%, 8.43%,and 13.34% per year respectively
during the same period. One per cent increase in export led to 0.48% of GDP per
year during the specified period. Production, employment, average productivity
and export of SSI showed two cointegrating vectors whose vector error
correction is stable,divergent and insignificant error correction process.
India’s GDP, SSI sector’s output, employment, average productivity and export
have two cointegrating vectors but its error correction model is stable,
divergent and insignificant error correction having problem of
autocorrelations. New policy recommendations of RBI and new government policy
on MSME are likely to accelerate the performance of SSI and its contribution to
the national economy.
References
Bala,
N. (20007). Economic Reforms and Growth
of Small Scale Industries, New Delhi, Deep & Deep Publications.
Bansal,
S. K. (1992). Financial Problems of Small Scale Industries, New Delhi ,Anmol
Publications.
Basem,
M. Lozi.(2008). Small-Scale Industries in the Globalization Era: The case of
Jordan, Journal of Business and Public
Affairs. www.scientificjournals. org/journals2008 /articles1348.pdf
Bayiuei,Srinivasulu.(2004).The
role and performance of small scale industries in Indian Economy, The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics.
Bhavani,
T.A. (2002,July). Small-Scale Units in the Era of Globalisation: Problems and
Prospects, Economic and Political Weekly,
Special Article.
Chowdhury,Mamata.,&Saini,Anjali.(2015,Jan-June).
Globalisation and Its Impact on the Performance of Small Scale Industries in
India, International Journal of Trade and
Commerce,4(1),160-171.
Datt,
R., & Sundaram, K. P. M. (1999). Indian Economy, (39th Edn.). New
Delhi ,S. Chand & Company.
Desai,Vasanta.(2007).
Management of Small Scale Industry, Mumbai,Himalaya
Publishing House, 564-565
Garg,C.C.(1996,October).Growth
of Small Scale Industries in India-some policy issues, Working Paper-10,NIPFP
Government
of India. (2010).Report on Prime Minister Task Force on Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprise. Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise, New Delhi.
Government
of India.(2012-17). Report on Working Group on Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprise Growth for 12th Five year Plan.
Grant
,Thornton. (2010,April). Vision 2020: Implication for MSME (Online)
Hussain,
Syed Vazith.(2004,Jan).Performance of small scale industries in India and the
challenges ahead, Indian Journal of
Industrial Relation,39(3),391-401.
Jain,Neelam.(2004,March).Small
Scale Industries in the new Millennium, SEDME,
30(1).
Jena,R.K.(2009,May).Small
Scale Industries in the Path of growth and promoting exports. DGCIS.
Kumar,Nallabal
Kalyan.,& Sardar, Gugloth. (2011,Jan-June). Competitive Performance of
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise in India.
Asia Pacific Journal of Social
Science,8 (1).
Loksava
Secretariat.(2014).Growth and performance of Medium and Small Scale Industries.
New Delhi
Malapati,Venkataramanaiah.(2011,June).The
Performance of Small Scale Industries in India:An Overview,ssrn.com
Mishra,Shivani.(2012,July).Small
Scale Industries:Striving and Friving in the era of globalization, International
Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems,2(2).
No comments:
Post a Comment