Dr.DEBESH BHOWMIK

Dr.DEBESH BHOWMIK

Friday, 20 July 2018

Renewable Energy Sources and Environment Protection




CHAPTER - 7

Linkage between Global Co2 Emission and
World GDP
Dr. Debesh Bhowmik
Retired Principal,
Associated with International Institute
for Development Studies, Kolkata, India.
Abstract
In this paper author attempted to verify the relationship between global CO2
emission and global GDP ,and between CO2 emission per capita and GDP
growth or GDP per capita growth rate during 1960-2015 through double log
regression model,Granger Cusality test,Johansen cointegration model and by
vector error correction model and impulse response functions.The trend of
emission and per capita emission are shown by semi-log regression model.The
structural breaks of emission is shown by Bai-Perron model. The paper
concludes that the global co2 emission has been rising at the rate of 2.19% per
year and per capita co2 emission is rising at the rate of 0.58% per annum
significantly during 1960-2015.Both of them are stationary,stable and
convergent according to ARIMA(1,1,1) model and they do not belong to random
walk hypothesis. Global CO2 emission during 1960-2015 contains four upward
structural breaks in 1968,1976,1988, and 2004 respectively and per capita
emission has two upward structural breaks in 1969 and 2004 respectively.World
CO2 emission is positively related significantly with global GDP,and GDP per
capita during 1960-2015.World CO2 emission per capita is positively related
significantly with world GDP,GDP growth per capita during the same
period.But global GDP growth is negatively related with global CO2 emission
significant during 1960-2015.There are no cointegration between world GDP
and world CO2 emission and CO2 emission per capita but there is one
CHAPTER - 7
94 Renewable Energy Sources & Environment Protection
cointegrating vector in each between global GDP growth ,global CO2 emission
and world CO2 emission per capita during 1960-2015 repectively.Both of them
have stable,stationary and convergent VEC model whose impulse response
functions are converging towards zero.
Keywords: world CO2 emission,world per capita CO2 emission,world GDP,
world GDP per capita,world GDP growth.
JEL- O13, O40, O44, P28, P48, Q43, Q53, Q56,
I. Introduction
During1960-2015, emissions of CO2 from fuel combustion have tripled and the
main actors have changed. In 1960 the contribution of emissions by China was
around 9%, 1% for India and 10% for rest of the world. By 2015, their
contribution was 24%, 5% and 23% respectively, and China becomes the largest
emitter in the world. Most previous studies of CO2 – Income relationship aim
either to verify and estimate the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis
of economic inequity or to describe the long-run equilibrium relationship
between GHG emissions and energy consumption, or GDP, or other. The first
application of Kuznets Curve to environmental studies is done by Grossman and
Krueger (1991, 1993, 1995) followed by Holtz-Eakin (1995) , or more recently
by Perman and Stern (2003), McKitrick and Strazicich (2005) , Aldy (2006) and
Dinda (2004). The results of these studies are controversial about EKC’s
hypothesis, giving opposite conclusions. Dinda and Coondoo (2006) performed
cointegration analysis between per capita CO2 emissions and per capita GDP on
a panel of 88 countries and conclude that a long-run relationship exists between
the variables. The econometric approach which is usually used to estimate the
relationship between GHG emissions and economic growth, as well as to test
EKC hypothesis, has been criticized in academic literature on many points. The
countries with the same level of economic development may have different
relationship between emissions and economic growth for many reasons. The
global CO2 emission scenario is clear since CO2 emission is increasing along
with global GDP or GDP growth rate. The relationship does not behave like EKC
hypothesis. This paper is an empirical attempt to show the relationship clearly
through econometric analysis.
Renewable Energy Sources & Environment Protection 95
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
There are huge economic literatures on climate change and environment
protection and with related themes. I have discussed some of the researches on
the subjects that are correlated with my article.
Azomahou, Laisney and Van(2005) examined the empirical relation between
CO2 emissions per capita and GDP per capita during the period 1960-1996, using
a panel of 100 countries. Estimation results show that this relationship is upward
sloping. Choi, Heshmati,& Cho(2010) took data (1971-2006) from China (an
emerging market), Korea (a newly industrialized country), and Japan (a
developed country) and estimated EKC which showed different temporal
patterns. China shows an N-shaped curve while Japan has a U-shaped curve.
Tiwari (2011) found that environmental degradation (i.e., CO2 emissions)
Granger causes economic growth in the long-run in India during 1971-2005.
Arouri, Youssef, M'Henni, & Rault(2012) taking 12 Middle East and North
African Countries (MENA) data over the period 1981–2005 showed that real
GDP exhibits a quadratic relationship with CO2 emissions for the region as a
whole. Farhani (2012) verified 15 MENA countries covering the annual period
1973-2008 and found that there is a unidirectional causality running from GDP
and CO2 emissions to EC. The results indicate that an increase in energy
consumption may lead to increase in the income and the CO2 emission. Lean &
Smyth(2013) examined in ASEAN countries over the period 1980 to 2006. The
long-run estimates indicate that there is a statistically significant positive
association between electricity consumption and emissions and a non-linear
relationship between emissions and real output, consistent with the
Environmental Kuznets Curve. Chueh(2014) showed that the emissions of
carbon dioxide may not depend on the growth of per capita GDP using the
hierarchical clustering approach to cluster 36 countries during 1990-2011. Alam
(2014) examined the relationship between economic growth (GDP per capita)
and CO2 emissions of Bangladesh based on the environmental Kuznets curve
hypothesis, using World Bank data over 1972-2010 and found that the existence
of EKC U” shape does not hold. Antonakakis , Chatziantoniou and Filis(2015)
took data of 106 countries during 1971-2011 which revealed that the effects of
the various types of energy consumption on economic growth and emissions are
heterogeneous on the various groups of countries. Moreover, causality between
total economic growth and energy consumption is bidirectional, and the
continued process of growth aggravates the greenhouse gas emissions
phenomenon. Omri(2015) examines the nexus between CO2 emissions, energy
96 Renewable Energy Sources & Environment Protection
consumption and economic growth using simultaneous-equations models with
panel data of 14 MENA countries over the period 1990-2011. His results show
that there exists bidirectional causal relationship between energy consumption
and economic growth and there exists bidirectional causal relationship between
economic growth and CO2 emissions for the region as a whole. Muhyidin,
Saifullah,& Fei(2015) showed that CO2 emission, income development level,
total energy usage within the country and industrial production index growth to
be cointegrated thus indicating a long-run cointegrating relationship among all
the series in Malaysia during 1970 to 2012. Mesagan(2015) studied in Nigeria
during 1970-2013 and verified that growth relates positively with CO2 emission
using VECM.In China, during 1990–2012, Wang ,Li , Fang , & Zhou(2016)
found that surprisingly, no such causal relation was found between economic
growth and CO2 emissions. Mir and Storm(2016) verified that CO2 emissions
are monotonically increasing with per capita GDP for 40 countries (and 35
industries) during 1995-2007. Magazzino(2016) showed that the predominance
of the “growth hypothesis” emerges in three GCC countries (Kuwait, Oman, and
Qatar), since energy use drives the real GDP. Moreover, only for Saudi Arabia a
clear long-run relation has not been discovered. Finally, the results of the
variance decompositions and impulse response functions broadly confirm their
previous empirical findings. Their results significantly reject the assumption that
energy is neutral for growth during 1960-2013. Xiongling (2016) suggests that
there is evidence that economic development can improve environmental
degradation in the long-run and economic growth may have an adverse effect on
the CO2 emissions in China during 1961-2010. Cederborg & Snöbohm(2016)
conducted on 69 industrial countries as well as 45 poor countries using crosssectional
data and conclude that there is a relationship between economic growth
and environmental degradation, the impact of this relationship is however
different. The empirical result of the cross-sectional study implies there is in fact
a relationship between per capita GDP and per capita carbon dioxide emissions.
The correlation is positive. Ahmada, Azreen, Zulkiflib, Aziz,Hassanc,Yaseer &
Abdoh(2016) found strong positive relationship between GDP and energy
consumption during 1980-2011 in Malaysia.
III. Objectives of study
This study endeavours to verify the empirical relationship through econometric
models between world CO2 emission in kilo ton and world GDP(current
US$),world CO2 emission per capita in metric ton with world GDP and GDP per
capita (in current US$ ) and with their growth rates respectively during 1960-
2015 showing the empirical evidences in several countries.
VII. Concluding remarks
The paper concludes that the global co2 emission has been rising at the rate of
2.19% per year and per capita co2 emission is rising at the rate of 0.58% per
annum significantly during 1960-2015.Both of them are stationary, stable and
convergent according to ARIMA(1,1,1) model and they do not belong to random
walk hypothesis. Global CO2 emission during 1960-2015 contains four upward
structural breaks in 1968, 1976, 1988, and 2004 respectively and per capita
emission has two upward structural breaks in 1969 and 2005 respectively. World
CO2 emission is positively related significantly with global GDP, and GDP per
capita during 1960-2015.World CO2 emission per capita is positively related
significantly with world GDP,GDP growth per capita during the same period.
But global GDP growth is negatively related with global CO2 emission
significant during 1960-2015.There are no cointegration between world GDP and
world CO2 emission and CO2 emission per capita but there is one cointegrating
vector in each between global GDP growth , global CO2 emission and world CO2
emission per capita during 1960-2015 repectively. Both of them have stable,
stationary and convergent VEC model whose impulse response functions are
converging towards zero.

Read from
www.irphouse.com




1 comment:

  1. The information is extremely good and very helpful or me and keep sharing your blogs
    Home Tutors in Lucknow | Home Tuition Service

    ReplyDelete