CHAPTER - 7
Linkage between
Global Co2
Emission
and
World GDP
Dr. Debesh Bhowmik
Retired Principal,
Associated with International
Institute
for Development Studies, Kolkata,
India.
Abstract
In this paper author attempted to
verify the relationship between global CO2
emission and global GDP ,and
between CO2
emission per
capita and GDP
growth or GDP per capita growth
rate during 1960-2015 through double log
regression model,Granger Cusality
test,Johansen cointegration model and by
vector error correction model and
impulse response functions.The trend of
emission and per capita emission
are shown by semi-log regression model.The
structural breaks of emission is
shown by Bai-Perron model. The paper
concludes that the global co2 emission has been rising at the
rate of 2.19% per
year and per capita co2 emission is rising at the rate of
0.58% per annum
significantly during
1960-2015.Both of them are stationary,stable and
convergent according to
ARIMA(1,1,1) model and they do not belong to random
walk hypothesis. Global CO2 emission during 1960-2015
contains four upward
structural breaks in
1968,1976,1988, and 2004 respectively and per capita
emission has two upward
structural breaks in 1969 and 2004 respectively.World
CO2 emission is positively related
significantly with global GDP,and GDP per
capita during 1960-2015.World CO2 emission per capita is positively
related
significantly with world GDP,GDP
growth per capita during the same
period.But global GDP growth is
negatively related with global CO2 emission
significant during 1960-2015.There
are no cointegration between world GDP
and world CO2 emission and CO2 emission per capita but there is
one
CHAPTER - 7
94 Renewable Energy Sources & Environment Protection
cointegrating vector in each
between global GDP growth ,global CO2 emission
and world CO2 emission per capita during
1960-2015 repectively.Both of them
have stable,stationary and
convergent VEC model whose impulse response
functions are converging towards
zero.
Keywords: world CO2 emission,world per capita CO2 emission,world GDP,
world GDP per capita,world GDP
growth.
JEL- O13, O40, O44, P28, P48,
Q43, Q53, Q56,
I. Introduction
During1960-2015, emissions of CO2 from fuel combustion have tripled
and the
main actors have changed. In 1960 the contribution
of emissions by China was
around 9%, 1% for India and 10% for rest of the
world. By 2015, their
contribution was 24%, 5% and 23% respectively, and
China becomes the largest
emitter in the world. Most previous studies of CO2 – Income relationship aim
either to verify and estimate the Environmental
Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis
of economic inequity or to describe the long-run
equilibrium relationship
between GHG emissions and energy consumption, or
GDP, or other. The first
application of Kuznets Curve to environmental
studies is done by Grossman and
Krueger (1991, 1993, 1995) followed by Holtz-Eakin
(1995) , or more recently
by Perman and Stern (2003), McKitrick and Strazicich
(2005) , Aldy (2006) and
Dinda (2004). The results of these studies are controversial
about EKC’s
hypothesis, giving opposite conclusions. Dinda and
Coondoo (2006) performed
cointegration analysis between per capita CO2 emissions and per capita GDP on
a panel of 88 countries and conclude that a long-run
relationship exists between
the variables. The econometric approach which is
usually used to estimate the
relationship between GHG emissions and economic
growth, as well as to test
EKC hypothesis, has been criticized in academic
literature on many points. The
countries with the same level of economic
development may have different
relationship between emissions and economic growth
for many reasons. The
global CO2 emission
scenario is clear since CO2
emission is
increasing along
with global GDP or GDP growth rate. The relationship
does not behave like EKC
hypothesis. This paper is an empirical attempt to
show the relationship clearly
through econometric analysis.
Renewable Energy Sources & Environment Protection 95
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
There are huge economic literatures on climate
change and environment
protection and with related themes. I have discussed
some of the researches on
the subjects that are correlated with my article.
Azomahou, Laisney and Van(2005) examined the
empirical relation between
CO2 emissions
per capita and GDP per capita during the period 1960-1996, using
a panel of 100 countries. Estimation results show
that this relationship is upward
sloping. Choi, Heshmati,& Cho(2010) took data
(1971-2006) from China (an
emerging market), Korea (a newly industrialized
country), and Japan (a
developed country) and estimated EKC which showed
different temporal
patterns. China shows an N-shaped curve while Japan
has a U-shaped curve.
Tiwari (2011) found that environmental degradation
(i.e., CO2
emissions)
Granger causes economic growth in the long-run in
India during 1971-2005.
Arouri, Youssef, M'Henni, & Rault(2012) taking
12 Middle East and North
African Countries (MENA) data over the period 1981–2005
showed that real
GDP exhibits a quadratic relationship with CO2 emissions for the region as a
whole. Farhani (2012) verified 15 MENA countries
covering the annual period
1973-2008 and found that there is a unidirectional
causality running from GDP
and CO2 emissions
to EC. The results indicate that an increase in energy
consumption may lead to increase in the income and
the CO2
emission. Lean &
Smyth(2013) examined in ASEAN countries over the
period 1980 to 2006. The
long-run estimates indicate that there is a
statistically significant positive
association between electricity consumption and
emissions and a non-linear
relationship between emissions and real output,
consistent with the
Environmental Kuznets Curve. Chueh(2014) showed that
the emissions of
carbon dioxide may not depend on the growth of per
capita GDP using the
hierarchical clustering approach to cluster 36
countries during 1990-2011. Alam
(2014) examined the relationship between economic
growth (GDP per capita)
and CO2 emissions
of Bangladesh based on the environmental Kuznets curve
hypothesis, using World Bank data over 1972-2010 and
found that the existence
of EKC “U” shape does not hold. Antonakakis
, Chatziantoniou and Filis(2015)
took data of 106 countries during 1971-2011 which
revealed that the effects of
the various types of energy consumption on economic
growth and emissions are
heterogeneous on the various groups of countries.
Moreover, causality between
total economic growth and energy consumption is
bidirectional, and the
continued process of growth aggravates the greenhouse
gas emissions
phenomenon. Omri(2015) examines the nexus between CO2 emissions, energy
96 Renewable Energy Sources & Environment Protection
consumption and economic growth using
simultaneous-equations models with
panel data of 14 MENA countries over the period
1990-2011. His results show
that there exists bidirectional causal relationship
between energy consumption
and economic growth and there exists bidirectional
causal relationship between
economic growth and CO2 emissions for the region as a whole. Muhyidin,
Saifullah,& Fei(2015) showed that CO2 emission, income development
level,
total energy usage within the country and industrial
production index growth to
be cointegrated thus indicating a long-run
cointegrating relationship among all
the series in Malaysia during 1970 to 2012.
Mesagan(2015) studied in Nigeria
during 1970-2013 and verified that growth relates
positively with CO2
emission
using VECM.In China, during 1990–2012, Wang ,Li ,
Fang , & Zhou(2016)
found that surprisingly, no such causal relation was
found between economic
growth and CO2 emissions.
Mir and Storm(2016) verified that CO2 emissions
are monotonically increasing with per capita GDP for
40 countries (and 35
industries) during 1995-2007. Magazzino(2016) showed
that the predominance
of the “growth hypothesis” emerges in three GCC
countries (Kuwait, Oman, and
Qatar), since energy use drives the real GDP.
Moreover, only for Saudi Arabia a
clear long-run relation has not been discovered.
Finally, the results of the
variance decompositions and impulse response
functions broadly confirm their
previous empirical findings. Their results
significantly reject the assumption that
energy is neutral for growth during 1960-2013.
Xiongling (2016) suggests that
there is evidence that economic development can
improve environmental
degradation in the long-run and economic growth may
have an adverse effect on
the CO2 emissions
in China during 1961-2010. Cederborg & Snöbohm(2016)
conducted on 69 industrial countries as well as 45
poor countries using crosssectional
data and conclude that there is a relationship
between economic growth
and environmental degradation, the impact of this
relationship is however
different. The empirical result of the
cross-sectional study implies there is in fact
a relationship between per capita GDP and per capita
carbon dioxide emissions.
The correlation is positive. Ahmada, Azreen,
Zulkiflib, Aziz,Hassanc,Yaseer &
Abdoh(2016) found strong positive relationship
between GDP and energy
consumption
during 1980-2011 in Malaysia.
III. Objectives of study
This study endeavours to verify the empirical
relationship through econometric
models between world CO2 emission in kilo ton and world
GDP(current
US$),world CO2 emission
per capita in metric ton with world GDP and GDP per
capita (in current US$ ) and with their growth rates
respectively during 1960-
2015
showing the empirical evidences in several countries.
VII. Concluding remarks
The paper concludes that the global co2 emission has been rising at the
rate of
2.19% per year and per capita co2 emission is rising at the rate of
0.58% per
annum significantly during 1960-2015.Both of them
are stationary, stable and
convergent according to ARIMA(1,1,1) model and they
do not belong to random
walk hypothesis. Global CO2 emission during 1960-2015
contains four upward
structural breaks in 1968, 1976, 1988, and 2004
respectively and per capita
emission has two upward structural breaks in 1969
and 2005 respectively. World
CO2 emission
is positively related significantly with global GDP, and GDP per
capita during 1960-2015.World CO2 emission per capita is positively
related
significantly with world GDP,GDP growth per capita
during the same period.
But global GDP growth is negatively related with
global CO2
emission
significant during 1960-2015.There are no
cointegration between world GDP and
world CO2 emission
and CO2
emission per capita
but there is one cointegrating
vector in each between global GDP growth , global CO2 emission and world CO2
emission per capita during 1960-2015 repectively.
Both of them have stable,
stationary and convergent VEC model whose impulse
response functions are
converging towards zero.
Read from
www.irphouse.com
The information is extremely good and very helpful or me and keep sharing your blogs
ReplyDeleteHome Tutors in Lucknow | Home Tuition Service