---------------Debesh Bhowmik
Hunger
concepts and definitions
Hunger is a term which has three meanings (Oxford English
Dictionary 1971)
- the uneasy or painful sensation caused by want of food;
craving appetite. Also the exhausted condition caused by want of food
- the want or scarcity of food in a country
- a strong desire or craving
- World 805
million people – or one in nine people in the world – do not have enough
to eat.
- 98% of the world’s undernourished people live in
developing countries.
- Where is hunger the worst?
- Asia: 525.6 million
- Sub-Saharan Africa:
214 million
- Latin America and the Caribbean: 37 million
- Aiming at the very heart of hunger, The Hunger Project
is currently committed to work in Bangladesh,
Benin, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, India, Ghana, Malawi,
Mexico, Mozambique,
Peru, Senegal and Uganda.
hunger
refers to the second definition, aggregated to the world level.
The related technical term is malnutrition,
or, if malnutrition is taken to refer to both undernutrition and overnutrition
(obesity, overweight) as it increasingly is, undernutrition. Both
malnutrition and undernutrition refer to the effects on people of not having
enough food.
There are two basic types of
malnutrition/undernutrition. The first and most important is protein-energy
malnutrition . This leads to growth failure. Principal types of
growth failure are:
- The two types of acute malnutrition are wasting (also
called marasmus) or nutritional edema, (also called kwashiorkor).
Wasting is characterised by rapid weight loss and in its severe form can
lead to death. Nutritional edema is caused by insufficient protein in the
diet. ...
.
- Stunting is a slow, cumulative process and is caused by
insufficient intake of some nutrients. It is estimated by the United
Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to affect 161 million children
world wide (UNICEF Nutrition).
Stunted children may have normal body proportions but look younger than
their actual age. Stunting develops over a long period as a result of
inadequate nutrition or repeated infections, or both.
The second type of malnutrition,
also very important, is micronutrient (vitamin and mineral) deficiency. This is
not the type of malnutrition that is referred to when world hunger is
discussed, though it is certainly very important. Specific examples of
micronutrient deficiency such as Vitamin A are discussed below
The United Nations Food and
Agriculture Organization estimates that about 805 million people of the 7.3
billion people in the world, or one in nine, were suffering from chronic
undernourishment in 2012-2014. Almost all the hungry people, 791 million, live
in developing countries, representing 13.5 percent, or one in eight, of the
population of developing counties. There are 11 million people undernourished
in developed countries .
Undernourishment around the world,
1990-2 to 2012-4
Number of undernourished and prevalence (%) of undernourishment
|
|
1990-2 No.
|
1990-2 %
|
2012-4 No.
|
2012-4 %
|
|
World
|
1,014.5
|
18.7
|
805.3
|
11.3
|
|
Developed regions
|
20.4
|
<5
|
14.6
|
<5
|
|
Developing regions
|
994.1
|
23.4
|
790.7
|
14.5
|
|
Africa
|
182.1
|
27.7
|
226.7
|
20.5
|
|
Sub-Saharan Africa
|
176.0
|
33.3
|
214.1
|
23.8
|
|
Asia
|
742.6
|
23.7
|
525.6
|
12.7
|
|
Eastern Asia
|
295.2
|
23.2
|
161.2
|
10.8
|
|
South-Eastern Asia
|
138.0
|
30.7
|
63.5
|
10.3
|
|
Southern Asia
|
291.7
|
24.0
|
276.4
|
15.8
|
|
Latin America & Carib.
|
68.5
|
15.3
|
37.0
|
6.1
|
|
Oceana
|
1.0
|
15.7
|
1.4
|
14.0
|
Poverty is the principal cause of
hunger. The causes of poverty include poor people's lack of
resources, an extremely unequal income distribution in the world and within
specific countries, conflict, and hunger itself. As of 2015 (2011 statistics),
the World Bank has estimated that there were just over 1 billion poor people in
developing countries who live on $1.25 a day or less. This compares with
compared with 1.91 billion in 1990, and 1.93 billion in 1981. This means
that 17 percent of people in the developing world lived at or below $1.25 a day
in 2011, down from 43 percent in 1990 and 52 percent in 1981. (This
compares with the FAO estimate above of 791 million people living in
chronic undernourishment in developing countries.) Progress has been slower at
higher poverty lines. In all, 2.2 billion people lived on less than US $2 a day
in 2011, the average poverty line in developing countries and another common
measurement of deep deprivation. That is only a slight decline from 2.59
billion in 1981. Progress in poverty reduction has been concentrated in
Asia, and especially, East Asia, with the major improvement occurring in China.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, the number of people in extreme poverty has
increased. The statement that 'poverty is the principal cause of
hunger' is, though correct, unsatisfying.
Hunger is also a cause of poverty, and
thus of hunger. By causing poor health, small body
size, low levels of energy, and reductions in mental functioning, hunger can
lead to even greater poverty by reducing people's ability to work and learn,
thus leading to even greater hunger.
- 1.4 billion people in developing countries live on
$1.25 a day or less.
- Rural areas account for three out of every four people
living on less than $1.25 a day.
- 22,000 children die each day due to conditions of
poverty.
Rural Hunger Project partners have
access to income-generating workshops, empowering their self-reliance. Our
Microfinance Program in Africa provides access to credit, adequate training and
instilling in our partners the importance of saving.
Poverty
in Africa.
In 1990, 56 percent of Africans lived on under $1.25
a day accounting for 15 percent of those in poverty worldwide. Over the
subsequent 20 years, the region’s poverty rate dropped to 48 percent. However,
given the superior pace of poverty reduction elsewhere and Africa’s faster
population growth, Africa’s share of global poverty doubled. Our baseline
scenario anticipates a continuation of these trends: sub-Saharan Africa’s
poverty rate is expected to fall further to 24 percent by 2030, representing
300 million people, but its share of global poverty balloons to 82 percent. By
2030, 21 percent of Africa’s population will be poor having stood behind the 70
cent mark today. This rate would be sufficient to lift those currently living
on 70 cents or more above the $1.25 a day poverty line by 2030. This level
happens to be around the average daily income of the poor in sub-Saharan Africa
today. Twenty-two percent of Africans live between the 70 cent and $1.25 mark,
while 25 percent live further back on under 70 cents.
In 1990, 56 percent of Africans
lived on under $1.25 a day accounting for 15 percent of those in poverty
worldwide. Over the subsequent 20 years, the region’s poverty rate dropped to
48 percent. However, given the superior pace of poverty reduction elsewhere and
Africa’s faster population growth, Africa’s share of global poverty doubled.
Our baseline scenario anticipates a continuation of these trends: sub-Saharan
Africa’s poverty rate is expected to fall further to 24 percent by 2030,
representing 300 million people, but its share of global poverty balloons to 82
percent.
The constraint facing these
remaining poor can be characterized in two ways.
First, the poor may not be moving
fast enough to reach the $1.25 threshold. This is a function of the rate of
economic growth in the countries in which they live, and the degree to which
this growth is equitable. Historically, sub-Saharan Africa has experienced long
stretches of anemic growth. During the lost decades of the 1980s and 1990s, the
region grew at just 2 percent a year, which meant that GDP per capita fell
given the rate of population growth. Though growth in the region as a whole has
improved in recent years, some countries continue to underperform and there are
concerns that the benefits of Africa’s growth are not being
shared by those near the bottom of the income
distribution.
Which of these impediments best
captures sub-Saharan Africa’s challenge: are the region’s poor moving too slowly
or starting too far behind?
To help answer this question, it is
useful to first establish some parameters linking past regional trends, today’s
circumstances and future prospects.
Over the last decade, sub-Saharan
Africa’s economies have together mustered an impressive 5 percent growth a
year, or around 3 percent in per capita terms (see Table below). Evidence from
household surveys suggests that this has, on average, translated into gains for
the poor: of the countries in the region with available data, half saw per
capita consumption of the poorest 10 percent of their populations rise by 3
percent or more a year during the period. Forecasts indicate that growth rates
should remain high in the foreseeable future, so it is not unreasonable to
expect that a 3 percent annual increase in income is sustainable for many of
those living in poverty.
This rate would be sufficient to
lift those currently living on 70 cents or more above the $1.25 a day poverty
line by 2030. This level happens to be around the average daily income of the
poor in sub-Saharan Africa today. Twenty-two percent of Africans live between
the 70 cent and $1.25 mark, while 25 percent live further back on under 70
cents.
Of
course, Africa’s aggregate economic performance masks considerable differences
between countries, and the location of the region’s growth engines doesn’t
align exactly with the location of its poor. Over the past decade, 11 economies
in the region experienced virtually no growth (Benin, Central African Republic,
Comoros, Cote d’Ivoire, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia,
Madagascar and Swaziland), while four economies are expected to stagnate over
the coming years based on present forecasts (Comoros, Madagascar, Malawi and
Swaziland). For these sluggish performers, the pace of progress is such that
living within reach of the poverty line today offers little assurance of
escaping poverty in the foreseeable future. Three percent of Africans in 2030
are expected to be poor simply because their country growth rates lag behind
regional performance. These individuals start between 70 cents and $1.25 and
remain there two decades later. We classify these poor people as moving too
slowly. (Head count ratio indicates poverty in the Table)
.jpg)
