Dr.DEBESH BHOWMIK

Dr.DEBESH BHOWMIK

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

GENDER AND ENVIRONMENT:PLAN OF ACTION

GENDER AND ENVIRONMENT:PLAN OF ACTION
----Dr.Debesh Bhowmik


The importance of gender mainstreaming in environmental and poverty eradication policies has been reflected in several forums and global agreements signed over the last 20 years. Yet, despite this, gender has been unevenly integrated into international conventions and implementation mechanisms. UNEP has a unique role in efforts to integrate gender within the policies and activities of global decision making bodies. Since 1993, successive UNEP Governing Council decisions have called upon UNEP to integrate gender and women’s perspectives more closely in its activities and policies. In 2006, UNEP called upon IUCN and WEDO to develop a strategic Gender Plan of Action to work towards the full integration of gender issues and women’s perspectives, UNEP’s Gender Plan of Action establishes strategies and targets and proposes instruments to address gender concerns within the organization. A brief target of the four core areas of the Plan of Action are given below.
[i] Secure high level commitment towards gender equality and environment
[ii] Develop a gender policy for organization
[iii] Allocate sufficient resources
[iv] Ensure that all new policies are gender sensitive.
Preamble to the CBD recognizes “the vital role that women play in the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity and affirm[s] the need for the[ir] full participation at all levels of policy-making and implementation for biological diversity conservation”. The Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) and various decisions of Conferences of the Parties (COP) also highlight women’s practices, knowledge, and gender roles in food production. However, while women’s participation in activities under the Convention is identified as important, gender equality is not directly addressed. the Secretariat of the CBD developed a CBD Gender Plan of Action (GPoA) in May 2008. Based on consultations with staff from the Convention, the UN and other organizations, this Plan of Action seeks to define the role of the CBD Secretariat in efforts, both in-house and with partners at the national, regional and global levels, to overcome constraints and take advantage of opportunities to promote gender equality. it has four strategic objectives: to mainstream gender into implementation of the CBD and work of the Secretariat; to promote gender equality in achieving the objectives of the CBD; to demonstrate the benefits of gender mainstreaming in biodiversity conservation, sustainable use and benefit-sharing from the use of genetic resources; and to increase the effectiveness of the work of the CBD Secretariat.
 
This initiative enabled the development of the first road­maps on Gender and REDD+. An essential point of depar­ture – and a central driving principle throughout – was to ensure that both women and men are fully recognized as important forest stakeholders: that they are afforded equal opportunity to learn about the initiatives, build the required capacity, and that they are able to meaningfully participate in-, contribute to-, and henceforth also benefit from for­estry and climate change policies, programs and funds.Women across the developing world are primary users of forest resources and their sale of non-timber forest products is vital to help cover household expenses and tide them through the leaner times of the year. Their heavier dependence on forests also means that women have more at stake than men when forests are degraded or forest access denied. Yet the needs and concerns of women are often neglected and the ownership of forests and the sale of valuable forest products are largely under the control of men.
Some of the targets are given below under the broad themes.
 Ensure equitable distribution of benefits:
1 Assess benefits sharing schemes to identify opportunities and constrains for women
2. Adapt benefits sharing schemes (or create new) to promote opportunities and address constrains for women
 3. Train women on benefits sharing schemes negotiation techniques
4. Prepare a gender sensitive evaluation to determine revenue distribution, utilization and monitoring fallouts. Ensure equitable distribution of benefits between women and men
To guarantee that women’s access to funds:
1. Create a forest conservation and women protection fund and secure resources (Tree Fund, private sector)
2. Train local women on fund acquisition procedures
3. Reflect on options to make fund acquisition process easy and affordable to women Ensure that women receive compensation, incentives, benefits and revenues
To ensure that gender considerations are fully integrated in forest sector and REDD+:
1. Institutionalize gender sensitive benefit sharing schemes, MRV system, forest management, AF systems, and information and communication system through: review lessons; taking note of best practices; guide lines and criteria identified during pilot schemes; where necessary, review policy and legislation; update monitoring and evaluation schemes

To support the establishment of a gender and forest task force:
1. Identify representatives from: women NGOs; national level women networks; organizations working on specialized topics (i.e. land tenure rights, domestic relations); national women mechanisms; women parliamentarian; gender focal points of development partners
2. Appoint a full time coordinator 3. Mobilize resources to support the activities of task force4. Identify decision-making bodies and processes where women need to be represented5. Advocate for women inclusion in decision-making bodies and processes Capacity building for women and women’s organizations
To build and strengthen women’s- and gender focused organization’s capacity on REDD+ issues:
1. Develop training materials on sustainable management of forests and REDD+ accessible to women
2. Conduct a sensitization campaign that pays special attention to women’s media preferences
3. Conduct trainings for local women on forestry and REDD+ issues Meaningful consultation and effective participation of women in design of REDD+
 To ensure effective consultation and participation of women in the design of the national strategy:
1.      Develop a methodology that promotes the consultation and full and effective participation of women which includes: assessment of barriers that limit women’s participation; mapping of target groups; organization and support of women platforms; actions that take into consideration community consultative meetings

To enhance participation through formal/informal education for women and girls in forestry sector:
1. Identify training institutions and conduct gender trainings for staff
2. Identify/create REDD+ relevant courses
3. Develop scholarship schemes and identify interested and qualified women4. Motivate women to remain in the forestry sector Meaningful consultation and effective participation of women in pilot projects
To guarantee women’s participation in REDD+ demonstration activities (pilot projects):
1. Identify good practices and actions to fully and effectively integrate women and replicate in pilot projects
2. Encourage the participation and involvement of women through the provision of resources (e.g. per diem)
3. Build the capacity of local women to participate and/or coordinate activities of pilot project
4. Provide women and men equal access and control over tools, equipment, technology and resources Gender is mainstreamed in policies reforms associated to REDD+
To support the mainstreaming of gender considerations in current revisions of policies:
1. Identify current policies under revision
2. Define mechanisms needed for women representatives to participate in these revisions
3. Facilitates consultations at the local and regional levels
4. Women representatives disseminates revised policies to their constituencies Collection of sex-disaggregated data and inclusion of gender analyses
To conduct gender-sensitive baseline studies and monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV):
1. MRV system generates sex disaggregated data on ownership, use, management, and access to resources
2. Identify activities carried out by women that could contribute to the data collection in MRV
3. Capacity building sessions for women on MRV methodologies and tools
4. Involvement of women in REDD+ MRV
5. Identify gender-sensitive practices and promote their implementation at a broader scale.


Monday, 8 July 2013

WORLD POVERTY IS STILL PERSISTING IN 2015









World poverty is still persisting in 2015
---Dr. Debesh Bhowmik

The World Bank has estimated the poverty line as the expenditure of 1.25 US$ per capita per day .On the basis of this measurement the world poverty is projected to decline at 970 million in 2015 compared to 1.2 billion in 2010 that is the poverty may reduce from 20.6% to 15.5% in which the progress of poverty in East Asia and the Pacific is promising because it will step down from 215 million in 2010 to 115 million in 2015 ie from 12.5% to 5.5%.The decline of poverty in South Asia is also more than expected since poverty stricken people was 507million in 2010 that will decreased to 406 million in 2015 – clearly a reduction from 31% to 23.2%.But the poverty amelioration in Europe and Central Asia and Latin America and Caribbean showed a little improvement .Even the Sub Saharan Africa will be able to cut poverty from 414 million to 408  million during the said period. The one and only exception is Middle East and North Africa where poverty rate has been rising from 2.4% in 2010 to 2.6% in 2015 ie from 8million poverty stricken people to 9 million. If ceteris paribus prevails, the target to achieve half of the world poverty stricken people has been failed. More over, the climate change and financial crisis may stipulate these figures.

2010(in million)
2015(in million)
World
1260
(20.6%)
970
(15.5)
East Asia and Pacific
215
(12.5%)
115
(5.5%)
Europe and Central Asia
3
(0.7%)
2
(0.4%)
Latin America and Caribbean
32
(5.5%)
30
(4.9%)
Middle East and North Africa
8
(2.4%)
9
(2.6%)
South Asia
507
(31%)
406
(23.2%)
Sub Saharan Africa
414
(48.5%)
408
(42.3%)
Source-WDR-2013,      
We also observed that world inequality is too high ie a wide gap between the income share of lowest and highest 20% and it is widening gradually. The income share of highest 20% in Argentina(49.4%), Belarus(35.8%),Brazil(58.6%), China(47.1%),Columbia(60.7%), Dominican(52.8%),Ecuador(53.89%),Indonesia(46.0%),Kyrgyz(41.4%),Mexico(52.8%),Moldova(41.2%),Nigeria(46.1%),Paraguay(56.4%),Poland(40.9%),Romania(36.1%),Thailand(46.7%),Turkey(46.0%) and Uruguay(50.9%).On the other hand income share of lowest 20% are in Argentina(4.4%), Belarus(9.4%),Brazil(2.9%),China(4.7%), Columbia(3.0%), Dominican(4.7%),Ecuador(4.3%), Indonesia(7.3%),Kyrgyz(7.7%),Mexico(4.9%),Moldova(7.8%),Nigeria(5.9%),Paraguay(3.3%),Poland(7.9%),Romania(8.8%),Thailand(6.8%),Turkey(5.5%) and Uruguay(4.9%) respectively during 2008-2010.
Naturally , poverty and inequality is the barrier of sustainable world development and in increasing human development in spite of several target oriented projects in fulfilling  MDG in the world economy as a whole.  

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

39th G8 Summit








39th G8 Summit --- by Dr.Debesh Bhowmik

The 39th G8 summit was held on 17–18 June 2013 at the Lough Erne Resort, a five-star hotel and golf resort on the shore of Lough Erne in County Fermanagh, Northern Ireland. It was the sixth G8 summit to be held in the United Kingdom. The earlier G8 summits hosted by the United Kingdom were held at London (1977, 1984, 1991), Birmingham (1998) and Gleneagles (2005).
The official theme of the summit was tax evasion and transparency. However, the Syrian civil war dominated the discussions. A seven-point plan on Syria was agreed to after much debate. Other agreements included a way to automate the sharing of tax information, new rules for mining companies, and a pledge to end payments for kidnap victim releases. The United States and the European Union agreed to begin talks towards a broad trade agreement.
According to Cameron, it was also the most difficult issue addressed. However, the leaders were able to overcome major differences and agree to a path forward. A declaration signed by the eight nations outlines a seven point plan for Syria. It calls for more humanitarian aid, "[maximizing] diplomatic pressure" aiming for peace talks, backing a transitional government, "[learning] the lessons of Iraq" by maintaining Syria public institutions, ridding the country of terrorists, condemning the use of chemical weapons "by anyone", and instilling a new non-sectarian government. They called for UN investigations into the use of chemical weapons with the promise that whoever had used them would be punished. Although Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was not mentioned by name in the declaration, Cameron said it was "unthinkable" that he would remain in power.
Agreements were also reached on global tax evasion and data sharing. The G8 nations agreed to tight rules on corporate tax that sometimes allow companies to shift income from one nation to another to avoid taxes. They agreed that shell companies should have to disclose their true owners, and that it should be easy for any G8 nation to obtain this information. Going forward, corporate and individual tax information will be shared automatically to help detect tax fraud and evasion. The Organization for Economic Co-operation was tasked with gathering data on how multinationals evade taxes.
The G8 nations agreed that oil, gas, and mining companies should report payments from the government, and likewise that the government should report the resources they obtain. The measure was aimed at helping developing countries collect taxes from first-world companies operating in their territories. A declaration to stop paying ransom demands for kidnap victims was also signed.
During the summit the United States and the European Union (EU) announced they would enter into trade deal negotiations. Canadian PM Stephen Harper said the EU and Canada were close to wrapping up a similar deal after years of negotiations which should not be affected by the US-EU announcement.
Harper and Obama also had an informal meeting to discuss border relations during the summit. Harper said they discussed "a range of Canada-US issues that you would expect, obviously the Keystone pipeline."
The cost of the summit is expected to be about £60 million. The Northern Ireland Government will pay £6 million and the British Government will pay for the rest.